Part IX · The Woman and the Bride, and the Anti-Woman
6 min read
In-depth:
There is another woman in this book, and she too is shown in a wilderness. That is no accident, and the text means it to be noticed. For the word "wilderness" — erēmos in the Greek — occurs in the whole book of Revelation only three times. Two of them are familiar: it is the place to which this book's woman flees and where she is nourished (12:6 and 12:14). And the third time? There sits a wholly different woman, and she is the mirror image of the first, reversed down to the last detail.
John is carried there in the spirit. "And he carried me away in the spirit into a wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns" (Revelation 17:3). A woman in the wilderness — just like this book's. But on what does she sit? This book's woman is borne on the wings of the great eagle, God Himself; this woman sits on the beast, the earthly form of the dragon, with exactly the seven heads and ten horns the dragon wore in chapter twelve. The one is carried by God, the other by the monster. And that is only the beginning of the reversal.
And how is she clothed? This book's woman is clothed with the sun (12:1), wrapped in the light of heaven itself. This woman is "arrayed in purple and scarlet, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls" (17:4) — not in heavenly light, but in the plunder of the wealthy, the finery of power. This book's woman wears a crown of twelve stars upon her head; this woman wears upon her forehead "a name: Mystery, Babylon the Great, the mother of the harlots and of the abominations of the earth" (17:5) — no crown of light, but a brand of shame. This book's woman is the mother of the Messiah; this woman is the mother of the harlots. This book's woman is nourished by the hidden hand of God; this woman is "drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus" (17:6). The one lives on the bread God gives her; the other is drunk with the blood she sheds.
Two women, one wilderness-word, and they are each other's perfect opposite.
And the deepest contrast is this: the one is the true bride, the other is her counterfeit. For everything the harlot is, is a parody of the woman. She has a cup in her hand, like a bride with a wedding cup — but it is "full of abominations and of the filthiness of her fornication" (17:4). She is decked out like a bride — but with stolen gold instead of with the light of her Bridegroom. She is called "mother" — but mother of harlots. She is adorned, desired, worshiped by the kings of the earth — a glittering, drunken, blood-stained imitation of the woman clothed with the sun. The ancient serpent, who can create nothing and can only counterfeit, has made a counterfeit here too: over against the mother of the Seed he sets the mother of the abominations, over against the bride of the Lamb the harlot on the beast. Two women in the wilderness, and the one is the dark mirror of the other.
And the end reveals which woman was which, for the two run to utterly opposite ends. What becomes of the woman who trusted in the beast? The beast devours her. "And the ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire" (17:16). She who was carried by the beast is torn apart by the beast; the power on which she rode turns against her and eats her up. But the woman who was carried by God is nourished, kept, and led out to a wedding. The one rode the beast and was eaten by the beast; the other was carried by God and brought home. That is the difference between the two women in the wilderness — and it is the difference between every false refuge and the only true one.
This chapter sets out a choice sharper than it seems. For there are only two ways to be a woman in the wilderness. You can sit on the beast — trusting in the power of the world, drinking from her cup, decking yourself with her gold — and be carried a while, glittering and desired, until the power you leaned on turns and devours you. Or you can be carried by God — hidden, nourished, sometimes unsightly and forgotten in the eyes of the world — and at the end be led out to a wedding. The wilderness does not make plain at once who you are; both women, after all, are "in the wilderness". The difference lies not in how it begins, but in who carries you and how it ends. Choose the eagle, then, not the beast. For all that glitters in that barren land is not the sun; and the only One who carries you out of the wilderness to a wedding instead of to a pyre is the God who bore your flight on the wings of the great eagle.
Two women, one wilderness-word, and they end in opposite ways. But there is yet a third woman in this book — and she is not the opposite of the woman of Revelation 12, but her sister.
The workbenchThe erēmos Mirror: the Woman (Rev 12) over against the Harlot (Rev 17)
The word erēmos ("wilderness") occurs in Revelation precisely three times: 12:6 and 12:14 (the woman) and 17:3 (the harlot). This mechanical rarity makes the juxtaposition of the two women in the same "wilderness" a deliberate literary mirror, and the contrasts are systematic: clothed with the sun (12:1) ↔ arrayed in purple and scarlet (17:4); crown of twelve stars (12:1) ↔ blasphemous name on the forehead (17:5); mother of the Messiah (12:5) ↔ "mother of the harlots" (17:5); nourished by God (12:6) ↔ drunk with the blood of the saints (17:6); borne on the eagle's wings / by God (12:14) ↔ seated on / carried by the beast (17:3); flight into the wilderness to be hidden ↔ displayed in the wilderness on the beast. The harlot is thus the anti-woman, the counterfeit bride: a parody-in-detail of the woman, the product of the same mimic (the dragon / ancient serpent) who throughout Revelation falsifies reality. And the denouement separates the two definitively: the beast devours the harlot that rode it (17:16), while the woman is kept and led out by God.
That the harlot of Revelation 17 is the opposite of the woman of Revelation 12 — both "in the wilderness" — is widely acknowledged among interpreters; what this book adds is that it works out that mirror systematically, detail by detail, alongside the familiar mirroring of harlot ↔ Bride (Rev 19/21). Well-documented (the erēmos count and the textual contrasts are hard); that John means the two women deliberately as a mirror is weighed — strong, borne by the rarity of the word and the systematic character of the contrasts. (The broader harlot line — Babylon and the question of her end-time embodiment — falls outside this book; this chapter lays its emphasis on the woman beside the harlot.)
There is another woman in this book, and she too is shown in a wilderness. That is no accident, and the text means it to be noticed. For the word "wilderness" — erēmos in the Greek — occurs in the whole book of Revelation only three times. Two of them are familiar: it is the place to which this book's woman flees and where she is nourished (12:6 and 12:14). And the third time? There sits a wholly different woman, and she is the mirror image of the first, reversed down to the last detail.
John is carried there in the spirit. "And he carried me away in the spirit into a wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns" (Revelation 17:3). A woman in the wilderness — just like this book's. But on what does she sit? This book's woman is borne on the wings of the great eagle, God Himself; this woman sits on the beast, the earthly form of the dragon, with exactly the seven heads and ten horns the dragon wore in chapter twelve. The one is carried by God, the other by the monster. And that is only the beginning of the reversal.
And how is she clothed? This book's woman is clothed with the sun (12:1), wrapped in the light of heaven itself. This woman is "arrayed in purple and scarlet, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls" (17:4) — not in heavenly light, but in the plunder of the wealthy, the finery of power. This book's woman wears a crown of twelve stars upon her head; this woman wears upon her forehead "a name: Mystery, Babylon the Great, the mother of the harlots and of the abominations of the earth" (17:5) — no crown of light, but a brand of shame. This book's woman is the mother of the Messiah; this woman is the mother of the harlots. This book's woman is nourished by the hidden hand of God; this woman is "drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus" (17:6). The one lives on the bread God gives her; the other is drunk with the blood she sheds.
Two women, one wilderness-word, and they are each other's perfect opposite.
And the deepest contrast is this: the one is the true bride, the other is her counterfeit. For everything the harlot is, is a parody of the woman. She has a cup in her hand, like a bride with a wedding cup — but it is "full of abominations and of the filthiness of her fornication" (17:4). She is decked out like a bride — but with stolen gold instead of with the light of her Bridegroom. She is called "mother" — but mother of harlots. She is adorned, desired, worshiped by the kings of the earth — a glittering, drunken, blood-stained imitation of the woman clothed with the sun. The ancient serpent, who can create nothing and can only counterfeit, has made a counterfeit here too: over against the mother of the Seed he sets the mother of the abominations, over against the bride of the Lamb the harlot on the beast. Two women in the wilderness, and the one is the dark mirror of the other.
And the end reveals which woman was which, for the two run to utterly opposite ends. What becomes of the woman who trusted in the beast? The beast devours her. "And the ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire" (17:16). She who was carried by the beast is torn apart by the beast; the power on which she rode turns against her and eats her up. But the woman who was carried by God is nourished, kept, and led out to a wedding. The one rode the beast and was eaten by the beast; the other was carried by God and brought home. That is the difference between the two women in the wilderness — and it is the difference between every false refuge and the only true one.
This chapter sets out a choice sharper than it seems. For there are only two ways to be a woman in the wilderness. You can sit on the beast — trusting in the power of the world, drinking from her cup, decking yourself with her gold — and be carried a while, glittering and desired, until the power you leaned on turns and devours you. Or you can be carried by God — hidden, nourished, sometimes unsightly and forgotten in the eyes of the world — and at the end be led out to a wedding. The wilderness does not make plain at once who you are; both women, after all, are "in the wilderness". The difference lies not in how it begins, but in who carries you and how it ends. Choose the eagle, then, not the beast. For all that glitters in that barren land is not the sun; and the only One who carries you out of the wilderness to a wedding instead of to a pyre is the God who bore your flight on the wings of the great eagle.
Two women, one wilderness-word, and they end in opposite ways. But there is yet a third woman in this book — and she is not the opposite of the woman of Revelation 12, but her sister.
The workbenchThe erēmos Mirror: the Woman (Rev 12) over against the Harlot (Rev 17)
The word erēmos ("wilderness") occurs in Revelation precisely three times: 12:6 and 12:14 (the woman) and 17:3 (the harlot). This mechanical rarity makes the juxtaposition of the two women in the same "wilderness" a deliberate literary mirror, and the contrasts are systematic: clothed with the sun (12:1) ↔ arrayed in purple and scarlet (17:4); crown of twelve stars (12:1) ↔ blasphemous name on the forehead (17:5); mother of the Messiah (12:5) ↔ "mother of the harlots" (17:5); nourished by God (12:6) ↔ drunk with the blood of the saints (17:6); borne on the eagle's wings / by God (12:14) ↔ seated on / carried by the beast (17:3); flight into the wilderness to be hidden ↔ displayed in the wilderness on the beast. The harlot is thus the anti-woman, the counterfeit bride: a parody-in-detail of the woman, the product of the same mimic (the dragon / ancient serpent) who throughout Revelation falsifies reality. And the denouement separates the two definitively: the beast devours the harlot that rode it (17:16), while the woman is kept and led out by God.
That the harlot of Revelation 17 is the opposite of the woman of Revelation 12 — both "in the wilderness" — is widely acknowledged among interpreters; what this book adds is that it works out that mirror systematically, detail by detail, alongside the familiar mirroring of harlot ↔ Bride (Rev 19/21). Well-documented (the erēmos count and the textual contrasts are hard); that John means the two women deliberately as a mirror is weighed — strong, borne by the rarity of the word and the systematic character of the contrasts. (The broader harlot line — Babylon and the question of her end-time embodiment — falls outside this book; this chapter lays its emphasis on the woman beside the harlot.)