A note on the source text and the choices

4 min read
In-depth:

This book is a song of praise and not a reference work; the running text deliberately carries no footnotes. The strongest claims do rest on choices, though, and whoever wants to check them will find their grounds here. This note stands at the back, outside the running text, so that the apparatus does not interrupt the worship.

Two layers: main text and boxes

Each chapter has two layers. The main text narrates; the boxes go deeper. The Expert box shows the source text and the grammar, the Excursus the wider lines running through Scripture, the Heart box the pastoral application, meant to enrich and not to prove. The counts and structural observations are gathered in seven Dossiers at the back.

The working translation and the Name

The Bible quotations are the author's own working translation from the Masoretic Text and the Greek tradition, modern in tone and without archaisms. The divine Name is rendered as YHWH, where older translations have "the LORD"; Adonai is rendered as "Lord." In this way the personal name by which God made Himself known to His people regains its full weight, instead of dissolving into a title. That choice does not reject the tradition that leaves the Name unspoken out of reverence; that custom has its roots in the synagogue and has guarded the holiness of the Name for centuries. It is the same reverence, by a different road.

The grace formula (Exodus 34:6–7)

Chesed is rendered as "steadfast love," and beside emet as "steadfast love and faithfulness." It is a covenant word with a broad spectrum: faithfulness, goodness, compassion, grace, love, and reliability. A rendering such as "devotion" does justice to the faithfulness but dampens the warmth the word carries in Scripture, down to the love of the bridal days (Jer 2:2). Its covenantal freight has been thoroughly argued by K.D. Sakenfeld. That the formula echoes as a ground melody through the canon, in Joel, Jonah, Nahum, and Micah and in Psalms 86, 103, and 145, is widely acknowledged in the scholarly literature (Spieckermann 1990; Scoralick 2002; Lane 2010).

The forms of incomparability

Scripture voices God's matchlessness in four forms: the rhetorical question (mi kamocha, "who is like You?"), the negation (ein kamocha, "there is no one like You"), the verb of comparison (ein aroch, "nothing can be ranked with You"), and God's self-declaration ("I, and no other"). The recognition of these formulas as a distinct motif goes back to C.J. Labuschagne (1966).

Yashuv in Micah 7:19

Yashuv is read as an independent verb: "He will return, He will have compassion on us," with God as the acting subject. In favor of this reading, the verb can be read independently even in the passages cited for the adverbial reading (Gen 26:18; Deut 30:3), and in Micah 7:19 it stands in a series of three unconnected verbs. Still, it remains a choice; the adverbial reading ("He will again have compassion on us," as J.A. Soggin has it) is a real counter-voice.

The structural observations (the "seal of 37")

The Dossiers point to the equal length of Exodus 34:6–7 and Micah 7:18–20 (both 37 words, with maqef-joined words counted separately, because the maqef is a later Masoretic reading aid), to their middle word, and to a grid of letter counts around the number 11 in Micah 7:18–20. That grid was found exploratively; the counting rules and the test are given in the Dossiers. The same threefold rule applies throughout: the countable fact is well documented, its interpretation is a weighed reading, and the why remains speculative. The word "proven" does not fit here.

God's deep feeling and unchangeableness

The Excursus "Pity for God?" (chapter 4) takes "unchangeable" as steadfast, not unfeeling: what God feels wells up from His own heart and does not overtake Him from outside. That position draws on Calvin's doctrine of accommodation (Institutes I.13.1), on R. Lister, and on H.G.L. Peels, for whom God is "a Thou," "no abstraction, no sum of attributes." It lies between a strictly read impassibility, which takes the language of God's grief as mere figure of speech, and the line of A.J. Heschel and T.E. Fretheim, which places God's suffering closer to human suffering.

God's zeal and passion

God's jealousy, anger, and tears are read as forms of His love. The adjective qanna is used in the Old Testament only of God and is raised to a Name in Exodus 34:14. That zeal works along two lines: in the covenant with Israel, His people in a special way, and as Judge of all the earth. Following H.G.L. Peels (1995), jealousy counts as a special form of God's holiness; wrath and vengeance are variables, love is a constant. The prophetic language about God's inner being (Jer 31:20; 48:36; Hos 11:8) is predominantly read literally in recent interpretation of Jeremiah; the counter-reading as irony or stylistic device (Jones, Lundbom, McKane) is given in the Expert box "The King who weeps" (chapter 11). The divine Name in Song of Songs 8:6 (shalhevetyah) and the allusion to Sodom in Hosea 11:8 remain disputed; both are offered as readings.

A relational approach

The history between God and humanity is often approached from its relational side, as a bond that broke and that God patiently restores. That pastoral approach stands alongside the classic categories of covenant, election, and sin and does not take their place; where the text speaks of covenant and rebellion, that remains the load-bearing frame.

Literature (brief)

This list is illustrative, not exhaustive; it names the works on which the strongest choices rest.

C.J. Labuschagne, The Incomparability of Yahweh in the Old Testament (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1966; Pretoria Oriental Series V).

H.G.L. Peels, Wie is als Gij? Schaduwkanten van het oudtestamentische Godsbeeld (Zoetermeer: Boekencentrum, 2007).

H.G.L. Peels, The Vengeance of God. The Meaning of the Root NQM and the Function of the NQM-Texts in the Context of Divine Revelation in the Old Testament (Oudtestamentische Studiën 31; Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1995).

H.G.L. Peels, "Jeremiah, Prophet of Ultimate Ruin and New Hope," in H.G.L. Peels and S.D. Snyman (eds.), The Lion Has Roared. Theological Themes in the Prophetic Literature of the Old Testament (Eugene: Pickwick, 2012), 96–118.

H.G.L. Peels, Jeremiah 46–51 (Historical Commentary on the Old Testament; Leuven: Peeters, 2025).

A.J. Heschel, The Prophets (New York: Harper & Row, 1962).

T.E. Fretheim, The Suffering of God. An Old Testament Perspective (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984).

K.D. Sakenfeld, The Meaning of Hesed in the Hebrew Bible: A New Inquiry (Harvard Semitic Monographs 17; Missoula: Scholars Press, 1978).

R. Lister, God Is Impassible and Impassioned: Toward a Theology of Divine Emotion (Wheaton: Crossway, 2013).

H. Spieckermann, "Barmherzig und gnädig ist der Herr", Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 102 (1990), 1-18.

R. Scoralick, Gottes Güte und Gottes Zorn. Die Gottesprädikationen in Exodus 34,6f und ihre intertextuellen Beziehungen zum Zwölfprophetenbuch (Herders Biblische Studien 33; Freiburg: Herder, 2002).

N.C. Lane, The Compassionate, but Punishing God. A Canonical Analysis of Exodus 34:6-7 (Eugene: Pickwick, 2010).

J.A. Soggin, "šûb zurückkehren", in E. Jenni and C. Westermann (eds.), Theologisches Handwörterbuch zum Alten Testament II (München: Kaiser, 1976).

K.E. Bailey, Poet and Peasant (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976); Finding the Lost. Cultural Keys to Luke 15 (St. Louis: Concordia, 1992).

Text editions and reference works: the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia and the Nestle-Aland for the source text; the standard dictionaries and grammars of biblical Hebrew and Greek for the philological choices.