22

Saving and Structural

The remnant, the pangs, the thief and the two in the field

17 min read
In-depth:

The Day judges — the previous threads have shown that abundantly. But whoever stops there has missed the half. For beneath the dark threads runs a lighter one, and it is no less consistent: a series of fixed structures with which Scripture shows how people are saved through the Day. They are not loose words of comfort that soften the judgment a little; they are built-in mechanisms, always the same, that show that the Day is not only a judgment that falls but also a sieve that saves what falls through it. Four of these structures recur through the whole canon, and together they form the saving underside of the event: the remnant, the birth pangs, the thief in the night, and the two in the field.

The first, and the most fundamental, is the remnant. It is the fixed discovery of every Day-judgment in Scripture: never does God make a complete end; there always remains a rest, a seed, a stump out of which it sprouts anew. Already with Noah it was so — one household through the flood — and the pattern holds to the end. Amos, whose book is almost entirely judgment, ends at an exception: "behold, the eyes of the Lord GOD are against this sinful kingdom [...] but I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob" (9:8). Isaiah made it the name of his son — Shear-Jashub, "a remnant shall return" (7:3) — and expounds that name: "though your people were as the sand of the sea, only a remnant shall return" (10:21-22), at once a threat (only a rest) and a promise (there is a rest). That same prophet calls that rest "the holy seed-stump": when the tree is cut down and burned, the stump remains, "and the holy seed-stump is its trunk" (6:13) — and out of that stump the shoot sprouts (11:1). Joel promises escape on Zion "among the survivors whom the LORD calls" (2:32). Zephaniah, after the whole cascade of his judgment, ends at "the remnant of Israel" that does no more injustice and grazes in safety, "and none shall make them afraid" (3:13). And Paul draws the thread through into his own time and beyond: "so too at the present time there has come to be a remnant according to the election of grace" (Rom 11:5) — and at the end of the same argument: "so all Israel shall be saved" (11:26), the hinge that Part V will work out. The remnant is, in short, God's signature under every judgment: never a period, always a comma. The Day prunes down to the trunk, but the trunk remains — and the pruning serves precisely the new growth. Whoever reads the Day without the remnant reads a tragedy; whoever reads the remnant along with it reads a purification.

The second structure is the birth pang, and it is one of the most carefully chosen images of all Scripture. Whenever the pain of the Day is described, the text reaches for the image of a woman in labor — and that is no arbitrary metaphor for "intense pain," for a labor-pain has a built-in outcome: it ends not in death but in a birth. Isaiah: "they are seized with anguish, pangs and sorrows grip them, they writhe like a woman in labor" (13:8); and of himself: "like a pregnant woman who draws near to giving birth, writhes and cries out in her pangs, so were we before Your face, LORD" (26:17). Jeremiah, over the day of Jacob's distress: "why do I see every man with his hands on his loins like a woman in labor?" (30:6). Micah makes the outcome explicit: "be in pain and labor, daughter of Zion, like a woman in labor — for now you shall go out of the city [...] and come to Babylon; there you shall be delivered, there the LORD shall redeem you out of the hand of your enemies" (4:10). Note that "there": the place of the deepest pain is the place of the deliverance. And Jesus sums it up in one term that orders everything: the signs — wars, earthquakes, famines — are "the beginning of the birth pangs," archē ōdinōn (Matt 24:8). Paul adds the sharpness: when they say "peace and safety," a sudden destruction comes upon them "like the birth pang upon a pregnant woman, and they shall by no means escape" (1 Thess 5:3) — for whoever does not labor but is carefree, the pang is only terror. Two things are in this image that no other image carries so well. First: the pain is productive — something is born; the new creation does not come into the world without birth pangs (Rom 8:22, "the whole creation groans and is in labor"). Second: the pain is increasing — pangs come faster and more violently as the birth nears, precisely the intensification of the judgments (chapter 19). And Jesus gives, elsewhere, the promise with it that completes the image: "a woman has sorrow when she gives birth [...] but when she has borne the child, she no longer remembers the distress, for joy that a human being has come into the world" (John 16:21). The birth pang of the Day is the preservation-through (chapter 8) in an image: there is a child at the end of the pain, and the joy makes the distress forgotten.

The third structure is the thief in the night — the image of the sudden, unexpected coming, and it cuts on two sides at once. "The day of the LORD comes just like a thief in the night" (1 Thess 5:2; 2 Pet 3:10). The exalted Christ takes the image over and makes it at once a threat and a beatitude: "if you do not watch, I will come like a thief, and you shall by no means know at what hour I will come upon you" (Rev 3:3), and: "behold, I come like a thief; blessed is he who watches" (16:15). And Jesus had already laid bare the logic: "if the master of the house had known in which watch of the night the thief would come, he would have watched" (Matt 24:43). Therein lies the whole point. A thief is a disaster only for whoever sleeps; for whoever watches, he loses his terror, for a watching householder is not taken by surprise. The unexpectedness of the Day is therefore no arbitrariness and no trap, but a summons: the only one taken by surprise by the thief is the sleeper. Paul draws precisely that conclusion for the church: "that day shall not overtake you like a thief, for you are all children of the light [...] let us then not sleep, as the others do, but let us watch and be sober" (1 Thess 5:4-6, chapter 16). The thief-image thus carries a curious comfort: the unpredictable hour is no threat to whoever lives in the light, but precisely the reason to stay awake — and whoever is awake has nothing to fear from the thief.

And the fourth structure is the sharpest, for it brings the separation into ordinary life itself: the two in the field. "Then there shall be two in the field; the one is taken and the other left. Two women shall grind at the mill; the one is taken and the other left" (Matt 24:40-41). Luke adds the night: "in that night there shall be two in one bed; the one shall be taken and the other left" (17:34-35). Two people, side by side — in the same bed, at the same millstone, in the same field — and the Day draws a separation straight through them. This is the structural core of the whole event, and it is disconcertingly intimate. The Day separates not people from people or city from city; it separates person from person, and the dividing line runs through the marriage bed and across the work floor. Who precisely is "taken" — taken away into safety, or carried off to judgment — is a question to be weighed honestly, for the immediate context (the days of Noah and Lot) allows both readings (see the excursus). But however you decide that question, the structure stands fast and it is inescapably personal: on the Day no group counts, no company, no marriage, no colleague. It goes, as Ezekiel 14 already said (chapter 9), each for himself — though Noah, Daniel, and Job were in the land, they would save only their own soul. The two in the field are the New Testament form of that same truth: outwardly indistinguishable, and yet by the Day irrevocably separated.

See the four structures now together, and the saving underside of the Day becomes visible in its whole. There always remains a remnant — the judgment never ends in nothing, it prunes in order to make grow. The pain is birth pangs — it issues in birth, not in death, and the joy will make the distress forgotten. The thief-warning is grace disguised as threat — whoever watches is not surprised. And the separation runs between two who resemble each other — so that the only question, again and to the last, is on which side you stand. The Day is therefore not merely a judgment that falls; it is at the same time built to save. It is a sieve in the hand of Someone who knows exactly what He seeks, who lets not a single true grain fall (chapter 21), and who has surrounded the pain of the passage with a remnant, a birth, a warning, and a choice. Whoever sees that still fears the Day — but no longer as a blind disaster; rather as a night of labor, whose morning one does not want to miss.


Excursus 22·1The remnant: the stump out of which it sprouts anew

The "remnant" (Hebr. she'erit / she'ar, "rest"; peleta, "escape") is one of the firmest structures of the Day, and it carries three properties that make it always the same. (1) It is always there: no Day-judgment in Scripture makes an utter end (Gen 7, Noah; Isa 1:9, "had we not been left a remnant, we would have become like Sodom"; 6:13, the holy seed-stump; 10:20-22; Joel 2:32; Amos 9:8; Zeph 3:13; Zech 13:8-9, "the third part"). (2) It is refined, not spared by chance: the remnant is precisely the silver that remains after the refining (chapter 21), "the survivors whom the LORD calls" (Joel 2:32) — no arbitrary survivors, but the purified core. (3) It is bearing for the future: out of the stump (Isa 6:13; 11:1) the new shoot sprouts; the remnant is the seed of the restored people, not merely what happened to be left over. Paul binds the three into one line running from the past by way of the present into the future: there was a remnant (Elijah's seven thousand, Rom 11:4), there is one ("according to the election of grace," 11:5), and there comes a fullness ("so all Israel shall be saved," 11:26) — the redemptive-historical hinge of Part V. The remnant is thereby the most compressed form of hope in all the prophecy: it proves that God's judgment always stands in the service of His preservation. (The omnipresence, refining, and future-function of the remnant: well-documented. The fitting into Rom 11: weighed; see Part V.)

Excursus 22·2The birth pangs: pain with a built-in outcome

The image of the birth pang (chevle jolēda; Greek ōdines) is no arbitrary metaphor for much suffering, but a carefully chosen image with a built-in destination: birth pangs end in a birth. The thread runs through the whole Scripture — Isa 13:8; 21:3; 26:17-18; Jer 4:31; 6:24; 30:6; Micah 4:9-10; Hos 13:13; Matt 24:8; 1 Thess 5:3; Rom 8:22. Three lines leap out. (1) The pain is the way to the salvation, not its end: Micah 4:10 puts it most sharply — "be in pain [...] like a woman in labor, for there you shall be delivered." The place of the pang is the place of the deliverance. (2) The pain increases: "beginning of the birth pangs" (Matt 24:8) implies a process that grows faster and more violent as the end nears — the intensifying judgments of chapter 19. (3) The outcome is joy that wipes out the pain: "when she has borne the child, she no longer remembers the distress, for joy" (John 16:21). One warning belongs with it, and Hosea gives it: the pang can also come to nothing if the child comes "not at the right time" and stays in the womb (13:13) — the birth pang does not guarantee the birth for whoever withdraws from it. But for whoever labors along, the image is pure hope: the new creation is born, and the distress of the Day is the last, most violent pang before the light. (The birth-pang thread and the birth-outcome: well-documented. The increasing intensity and the warning (Hos 13:13): weighed.)

Excursus 22·3"The one taken, the other left": who is taken?

Matthew 24:40-41 and Luke 17:34-35 depict the separation between two who are side by side — but who is the privileged one: the one taken or the one left? Two readings stand over against each other, and this book weighs them honestly, because there are real arguments on both sides. (1) Taken = taken away into safety (the classic rapture-reading): the verb paralambanō ("to take, to receive to oneself") is the same one Jesus uses in "I will take you to Myself, so that you may be where I am" (John 14:3); the one left then remains for the judgment. (2) Taken = taken away to judgment (the contextual reading): in the immediate context (Luke 17:26-30) Jesus refers to the flood, which "took them all away" (ēren, Matt 24:39), and to Sodom, out of which Lot precisely was left behind as one saved; then the "taken" are the judged and the "left" are the preserved — as Noah remained in the ark and Lot led out of the city remained alive. The grammatical and contextual arguments weigh on both sides; this book judges the second reading exegetically somewhat stronger in the immediate context (the flood as point of comparison), but keeps the question expressly weighed and does not let it be load-bearing for the rapture-placement, which rests on other grounds (Rev 3:10; 1 Thess 5:9; the zaʿam-boundary — Parts V-VII). What stands fast in any case, and that is the point of this chapter, is the structure: the Day separates irrevocably and personally between two who are outwardly indistinguishable. (The separation itself: well-documented. The identity of the "taken one": contested.)

DossierThe saving structures

Four fixed mechanisms with which the Day saves through the judgment.

StructureCoreKey places
Remnantthere always remains a refined, bearing restGen 7; Isa 6:13; 10:20-22; Joel 2:32; Amos 9:8; Zeph 3:13; Zech 13:8-9; Rom 11:5
Birth pangincreasing pain issuing in birthIsa 13:8; 26:17; Jer 30:6; Micah 4:10; Matt 24:8; John 16:21; 1 Thess 5:3; Rom 8:22
Thief in the nightsudden; only the sleeper is surprised1 Thess 5:2-6; 2 Pet 3:10; Rev 3:3; 16:15; Matt 24:43
Two in the fieldseparation straight through those who resemble each otherMatt 24:40-41; Luke 17:34-36

(The four structures: well-documented. The identity of the "taken one" (Matt 24:40): contested — Excursus 22·3.)

Expert noteshe'ar jasjub: the remnant as name and as tension

The central role of the remnant is evident already from this, that Isaiah made it the name of his son: שְׁאָר יָשׁוּב (she'ar jasjub), "a remnant shall return" (Isa 7:3) — the child he had to bring along to the tense meeting with King Ahaz, a walking prophecy. The name carries the whole doubleness of the Day in two words. As threat: only a remnant returns — the rest not; it is a word of judgment (so in 10:22, "though your people were as the sand of the sea, only a remnant shall return; a destruction is firmly decreed"). As promise: a remnant does return — the people does not utterly perish; it is a word of grace (so in 10:21, "a remnant shall return to the mighty God"). The Hebrew she'ar (7605) and the related she'erit (7611) carry through all the prophecy these two sides at once, and therein the remnant is the most compressed form of the "two faces" (chapter 3): in one single word the judgment (it is but a rest) and the salvation (there is a rest) stand inseparably together. Whoever hears "remnant" hears at once how heavy the judgment was and how sure the grace is. (The name, the double charge, and the tension: well-documented.)